Before I could throw to a greater extent than calorie-free on the championship of this post, permit me come upwardly to the business office of Automation Testing inward the Software Development Process. Though, I am non personally against Test Automation, silent I tend to uncertainty the effectiveness of exam automation inward the Software Testing Process! Though, I get got worked inward many Projects involving Test Automation, at that spot were exclusively few cases where Automation could yield the desired result. And inward near cases, exam automation was a nightmare rather than a moral boost for the exam manager!
Whenever a novel automation tool is lunched, the advocates of the novel tools claim that the applications give in-house testing professionals to a greater extent than control, including the powerfulness to perform tests that are repeatable alongside ease. However, critics of automated tools catch it equally a piteous substitute for a thorough in addition to nuanced manual exam that a skilled practitioner performs. Most experts agree, however, that an automated exam inward the hands of an untrained novice could produce to a greater extent than price than good.
"A fool alongside a tool is silent a fool," said Bill Harrod, a
security administration consultant at CA, formerly Computer Associates.
The master copy usage of adopting exam automation is to compass powerfulness inward performing exam executions faster in addition to to a greater extent than accurately than a manual tester. But inward practice, it becomes real difficult to achieve. I personally believe that exclusively exam automation is non goodness plenty for the over all wellness of a software. However, it tin ship away live used equally a supplement along alongside skilled manual testing. But exam automation inward itself is non at all sufficient equally far equally a testing approach is concerned. If at all, nosotros are using whatsoever automation testing tool, in addition to therefore also the effectiveness of the tool largely depends upon the science of the mortal using the tool. So at last, what matters is the science of the tester in addition to non the tool. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 tool powerfulness live alongside many smashing features to exam an application. But equally long equally the mortal using it is non good trained, it is going to produce to a greater extent than evil than good. More over, to prepare a novice takes much fourth dimension in addition to effort. If the same fourth dimension could live allotted to skilled manual testing (exploratory testing!), in addition to therefore I mean value that could yield amend results.
Your thoughts please…
More interesting articles here :Tutorial Software Sumber : http://www.softwaretestingtricks.com/
This is the best tutorial for software testers. I am a bigginer of software testing. Thank you so much for your blog and keep upload this type blogs.
ReplyDelete