Is Manual Testing Dying?
Manual Testing volition never dead, but tardily Manual Testing importance may move reduced Manual Testing or Automation Testing that depends on Type of software, Type of Testing, in addition to Production Environment etc...
tin dismiss move done inwards two ways,
1) Manual Testing
2) Test Automation or Automated Testing
Automation Testing can't embrace 100% exam case, thence closed to companies but role Automation Testing for regression exam only.
Generally Manual Testing is used laid out in addition to thence nosotros volition role Automation Test to
cover all areas quickly.
Automated tests are good - automatic. They won’t interact alongside the organization equally a
real user. Manual testing is the best testing approach for UI in addition to Ad-Hoc testing.
Using Automated Testing nosotros tin dismiss speedily exam the system, Data Driven Testing, Batch Testing, in addition to Parallel Testing are possible in addition to piece of cake but Test Tools bring several limitations,
Ex 1: Environment Limitations
1) UFT/QTP supports Windows Operating Environment only
2) Selenium Supports Web Application Testing only
Ex 2: Test Type Limitations,
Suppose if nosotros are conducting Functional Testing in addition to thence nosotros bring to role UFT/QTP or Selenium, SilkTest etc...if nosotros deport surgical physical care for Testing in addition to thence nosotros bring to use either LoadRunner or JMeter etc...
If it is manual Testing No surroundings Limitations in addition to no exam type limitations
to exam Software Applications, Suppose Applications on UNIX Environment or Windows Environment in addition to nosotros tin dismiss exam Web Applications in addition to Desktop Applications or whatever type of Software applications. And i to a greater extent than matter Manual Testing is to a greater extent than suitable for Games .
Conclusion, Manual Testing noesis is of import for fifty-fifty though we follow Automated Testing, but demo nosotros can't become Job with only Manual Testing, apart from Manual Testing focus on Automated Testing equally good then we tin dismiss easily become the Job in addition to Survive.
Anyhow is mandatory inwards Software Development inwards gild release quality Software in addition to maintains the Software...
Manual Testing volition never dead, but tardily Manual Testing importance may move reduced Manual Testing or Automation Testing that depends on Type of software, Type of Testing, in addition to Production Environment etc...
tin dismiss move done inwards two ways,
1) Manual Testing
2) Test Automation or Automated Testing
Automation Testing can't embrace 100% exam case, thence closed to companies but role Automation Testing for regression exam only.
Generally Manual Testing is used laid out in addition to thence nosotros volition role Automation Test to
cover all areas quickly.
Automated tests are good - automatic. They won’t interact alongside the organization equally a
real user. Manual testing is the best testing approach for UI in addition to Ad-Hoc testing.
Using Automated Testing nosotros tin dismiss speedily exam the system, Data Driven Testing, Batch Testing, in addition to Parallel Testing are possible in addition to piece of cake but Test Tools bring several limitations,
Ex 1: Environment Limitations
1) UFT/QTP supports Windows Operating Environment only
2) Selenium Supports Web Application Testing only
Ex 2: Test Type Limitations,
Suppose if nosotros are conducting Functional Testing in addition to thence nosotros bring to role UFT/QTP or Selenium, SilkTest etc...if nosotros deport surgical physical care for Testing in addition to thence nosotros bring to use either LoadRunner or JMeter etc...
If it is manual Testing No surroundings Limitations in addition to no exam type limitations
to exam Software Applications, Suppose Applications on UNIX Environment or Windows Environment in addition to nosotros tin dismiss exam Web Applications in addition to Desktop Applications or whatever type of Software applications. And i to a greater extent than matter Manual Testing is to a greater extent than suitable for Games .
Conclusion, Manual Testing noesis is of import for fifty-fifty though we follow Automated Testing, but demo nosotros can't become Job with only Manual Testing, apart from Manual Testing focus on Automated Testing equally good then we tin dismiss easily become the Job in addition to Survive.
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon.
ReplyDeleteSoftware Testing Services
Functional Testing Services
Test Automation Services
QA Automation Testing Services
Regression Testing Services
API Testing Services
Compatibility Testing Services
Performance Testing Services
Security Testing Services
Vulnerability Testing Services
Functional Testing Services
Good post about Game Testing Services. I learn something totally new and challenging on Game Testing Companies blogs I stumble upon on a daily basis. It will always be interesting to read Video Game Testing Companies articles from other authors and practice something from their websites...
ReplyDelete